Welcome Grant Robertson!
Reader Comments
(Page 1)2. sorry, While I typed:
-p2p is a way hot topic & ppl want to know & talk about it, plus its a polarizing issue which sparks lively debates (& web hits)
I meant to type:
-p2p is a way hot topic & ppl want to know & talk about it, plus it's a polarizing issue which sparks lively debates (& web hits)
Posted at 11:32AM on Apr 28th 2006 by rodrigo
3. Well, we'll just have to win you over with performance. I can tell you though, that this p2p blog is a high priority for me. I've just started blogging for WIN, so check back often and see if we're living up to our promise!
Posted at 2:44PM on Apr 28th 2006 by Grant Robertson








1. Great, another writer. According to your site there are at least 2 of you blogging on the peer2peer blog. SO, IF:
-there are at least 2 ppl authorized to post articles on this site
-p2p is a way hot topic & ppl want to know & talk about it, plus its a polarizing issue which sparks lively debates (& web hits)
-the ppl authorized to post articles here actually look forward to researching p2p & blogging about it
THEN WHY? Is there such a lack of new posts. Y'all create a new post like every two weeks or so, what the hell?
In the post above there was a comment that read:
"I'll enjoy watching [Grant Robertson] stretch out in this space"
Well, I call bullshit on that one & bet you that we will not see an increase in posts. I mean, c'mon, 2 bloggers with only 2 posts in the last 30 days. P2P is a hot enough & current enough topic that I am sure I could squeeze out at least 3 or so posts per week. You guys suck, I hope this blog gets its ass up to speed or gets kicked off the weblogs, inc network, or at least that someone who actually cares about p2p can take over. You have failed the community, you have failed yourselves. Grant Robertson & Brad Hill: Your lack of enthusiastic posting brings shame on both of your houses. You have failed us all.
Posted at 11:30AM on Apr 28th 2006 by rodrigo